<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chief Social Officer (tm) &#187; chief social officer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chiefsocialofficer.com/tag/chief-social-officer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chiefsocialofficer.com</link>
	<description>- strategy leading towards connected vision -</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social Web Awareness and Usage &#8211; How to Improve it?</title>
		<link>http://chiefsocialofficer.com/social-web-awareness-and-usage-how-to-improve-it/</link>
		<comments>http://chiefsocialofficer.com/social-web-awareness-and-usage-how-to-improve-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief social officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chiefsocialofficer.com/social-web-awareness-and-usage-how-to-improve-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aunt Mabel from Peoria?  Her space is not myspace.  And her face is in a book of recipes or bird feeding tips, not poking her super friends on facebook.  Nearly everyone&#8217;s heard of facebook and myspace, but most people are not using these sites.  Really. 
But, keep marketing and sharing and soon everyone will discover the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">Aunt Mabel from Peoria?  Her space is not myspace.  And her face is in a book of recipes or bird feeding tips, not poking her super friends on facebook.  </font><font size="2">Nearly everyone&#8217;s heard of facebook and myspace, but most people are not using <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9877437-7.html">these sites</a>.  <a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/03/networking_sites_myspace_faceb.html">Really</a>. </font></p>
<p><font size="2">But, keep marketing and sharing and soon everyone will discover the joys of being social online, yes?  With <a href="http://www.go2web20.net/">over 2,000 web 2.0</a> and social-genre sites vying for mind share, it is a crowded field in which surprisingly everyone can win. </font></p>
<p><font size="2">Hmmmmm&#8230;. can win? Most of the people I know think twitter is a sound made by birds, rather than a <a href="http://twitter.com">popular web 2.0 site</a>. But winning <em>can</em> (notice I don&#8217;t say <em>will</em>) be accomplished.  </font><font size="2">Among the social website winners will be the ones that got first &amp; got lucky, sure.  But the other winners will be the ones who started small, low-or-no-budget, and grabbed their niche.  Some of these <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/03/prweb791454.htm">potential winners</a> are still <a href="http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=137620">being launched</a>, as the barrier to entry to create a social site keeps dropping terms of both cost and technology.  </font></p>
<p><font size="2">Assume the average human brain already has remembered, say, 1,000 existing brand names for automobiles, computers, soap, banks, designer clothes, etc.  If so, then another 2,000 new web 2.0 brands are pretty much battling our organic memory capacity as much as battling each other, yes?</font><font size="2">  </font><font size="2">But a boating enthuasiast only has to remember a few sites such as <a href="http://TheBoaters.com">TheBoaters.com</a>, and not the other 2,000+ general and niche communities vying for her attention.  A dog-owner enthusiast only has to remember <a href="http://dogster.com">dogster</a>, and not <a href="http://catster.com">catster</a> and all those websites for other species.</font></p>
<p><font size="2">And as you probably know, the winners will also be the ones who blend into the social fabric, with widgets, social apps, voting buttons to embed in blogs, and perhaps a solid social media campaign.</font><font size="2"> </font><font size="2">Maybe this post is a little rambling from the title question, but maybe there is an answer. Awareness improves with usage (by more people who share with others), and usage increases due to the awareness of social sites by the Aunt Ednas &amp; Aunt Mabels out there.  One supporting aspect of this growth cycle is improvement in the usefulness and ease-of-use of the communities.</font><font size="2"> </font></p>
<p><font size="2">But, as someone who loudly writes that it&#8217;s not cool to overly do <strong><em>online-social</em></strong> activity as a substitute for <strong><em>offline-social</em></strong> interaction, I see us rubbing up against the attention paradox.  Everyone is pushing us to stretch the online attention envelope, and the sound of the birds I hear right now becomes real solace, pulling me offline to go jogging, to relax, instead of doing the rather unnatural act of channeling my social time &amp; activities through the tips of ten fingers (&#8230; and into the keyboard&#8230; over to some web server).  Sometimes we can all feel too lazy to type.</font><font size="2"> </font><font size="2">What will help online social growth is the same old same old &#8211; improvement of the platform &#8211; but also&#8230; something that better integrates this interaction with the rest of offline life.  Can we have a hands-free social networking technology, perhaps some sort of real-time social tagging via spoken words at a party?  How about microblogging (tweeting!) our location selectively as we travel, involving something other than typing in a cryptic message while perhaps driving a car into an airport?  We&#8217;ll get there, and you&#8217;ll find out about some of these types of improvements here via Chief Social Officer posts.</font><font size="2"><font size="2"><em>[post-writing update: the sound of nature did in fact pull me out for a jog after drafting the post, followed by some real-world socializing.]</em></font></p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chiefsocialofficer.com/social-web-awareness-and-usage-how-to-improve-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there an officer in the room?</title>
		<link>http://chiefsocialofficer.com/is-there-an-officer-in-the-room/</link>
		<comments>http://chiefsocialofficer.com/is-there-an-officer-in-the-room/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chairman of the board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief social officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chiefsocialofficer.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so without pretending that there will ever be a reporting structure of socially-networked people online, the musings here are going to assume that the reader *gets* the joke.  What joke?  The underlying one about the pompousness of an assumed Chief Social Officer &#8211; one who presides over, well, anything at all!
Officers, for instance, are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so without pretending that there will ever be a reporting structure of socially-networked people online, the musings here are going to assume that the reader *gets* the joke.  What joke?  The underlying one about the pompousness of an assumed Chief Social Officer &#8211; one who presides over, well, anything at all!</p>
<p>Officers, for instance, are typically elected, and have a term of office.  This website &amp; blog does not fit that category, except in the event that it closes down.  A typical officer reports ultimately to the Chairman of the Board, and the Board of Directors reports to stakeholders or shareholders.  We&#8217;ll have none of that here, either!</p>
<p>What we will have is a vision that evolves, with an aligned strategy, for effective social interaction and communication that is enabled by technology &amp; by people.  And humor.  Effective humor to make this all pontification more digestible.  Like how your stomach gets all happy when you eat your favorite food and you can listen longer to Aunt Edna droning on about &#8220;those kids these days and their electronic gizmo&#8217;s&#8221;  (and she doesn&#8217;t know you&#8217;re fiddling with your mp3 player in your pocket while you&#8217;re listening to her).</p>
<p>So, no &#8216;<em>officer</em>&#8216; in this room.  Only a huge, larger than life, out on a limb, gregarious &#8216;<strong>Officer</strong>&#8216; to lead the merry crowds towards social nirvana.  Or at least away from Aunt Edna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chiefsocialofficer.com/is-there-an-officer-in-the-room/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
